Papers submitted to RESEARCH MICRO undergo a rigorous, constructive peer-review process aimed at improving the clarity, quality, and scientific integrity of the work. Our goal is to ensure that all published research meets high ethical standards in the conduct, analysis, and reporting of scientific studies.

We collaborate with highly qualified scientists, academic editors, and a broad network of expert peer reviewers. The journal follows a single-blind peer-review model, in which reviewer identities are not disclosed to authors. Our editorial team is committed to providing objective, thorough, and constructive feedback and supporting authors throughout the publication process.

Upon submission, the Editors perform an initial assessment of the manuscript’s fit within the journal’s scope, scientific rigor, and quality of data presentation. Peer reviewers then evaluate the manuscript according to reviewer guidelines to ensure that the research we publish is scientifically robust, ethical, and of high quality.

Manuscripts authored by Editors or Editorial Board members will be handled by Editors who have no affiliation with the authors or their institution and will be evaluated in accordance with our editorial ethics policy. Please see the Editorial workflow below.